It seems that following the initial decision made back in April, the banks are likely to appeal against the ruling, and against the decision that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) can scrutinise OD charges.
As of 21st May 2008, the appeal is "under active consideration" according to a banking source.
Its argued that an estimated £3.5 billion is raised by banks, each year, by charging customers for unauthorised overdrafts and reversal of direct debits etc.
But what is worse for those that are trying to reclaim the charges, is that if an appeal is granted, the case could be dragged out until next year. Which means more hanging around waiting to see if the money can be reclaimed. In some cases, mine included, the banks take up to £30 off customers who go over their agreed OD limit. Thats EVERY time you go over your limit. So if you havent checked your account for a while, you didn't realise how much money you didnt have, and you need to buy food or pay a bill, a maximum of £30 is taken off you every time you add to the OD. What I found with my bank as well, is that on top of some charges going out during the month, some accumulate until a specified date (usually towards the end of the month..), and this total charge is debited in one clean swoop. Sometimes this has been as much as £150, which, by the time they take it off me, I dont have, putting me past my limit again and eligible for more charges. Its on ongoing cycle, especially when in a bit of an employment drought and a recovering student. And Im not the only one who thinks this is getting ridiculous.
Now you tell me if that's fair.
Alliance & Leicester have the right idea, charging a maximum of £5 for unauthorised transactions. I would switch, except I dont think they would have me in my current situation.